Schema Compatability - was Re: [xml-dev] incompatible uses of XML Schema

I just realized that a Schema Compatibilty open community project like
this would file really well under my OpenUnderstanding.com domain -

so: 

SchemaComp.OpenUnderstanding.com?
Schema.OpenUnderstanding.com?
Compatibility.OpenUnderstanding.com?

Something else? Nothing at all?

On 4/21/05, Rick Jelliffe <> wrote:
> Michael Kay wrote:
> 
> >>Perhaps vendors should be encouraged more to clearly state the limits
> >>to the conformance of their main products pages:
> >>   We don't support wildcards.
> >>   We don't support xsi':type
> >>   We don't support elements-in-elements
> >>   We don't enforce unambiguity
> >>etc.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Or perhaps some independent party could put this information together in one
> >place so that the rest of us can compare the products side-by-side.
> >
> >Michael Kay
> >http://www.saxonica.com/
> >
> >
> >
> I would be happy to collate a website for this (or is this better as
> part of Ron's database)?
> Please email to XML-DEV with phrase "Schema Compatability" in the subject.
> 
> Cheers
> Rick
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
> initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
> 
> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
> manager: <http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/index.php>
> 
> 


-- 
<M:D/>

:: M. David Peterson ::
XML & XML Transformations, C#, .NET, and Functional Languages Specialist