Re: [xml-dev] Avoding a repeat of W3C XSD - was Re: [xml-dev] Is Web 2.0 the new XML?

From
Rich Salz <>
To
Robin Berjon <>
Date
2005-08-19T21:10:06Z
ID
<>
Thread
Re: [xml-dev] Avoding a repeat of W3C XSD - was Re: [xml-dev] Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
> IMHO a large part of the problem here is that there are too few checks 
> during the Working Draft phase, which puts an enormous strain on Last 
> Call, resulting over time in the practice now increasingly common of 
> having multiple LCs, or of going to CR then back to LC, or giving up and 
> making a Note out of it, etc.

I agree.

Perhaps W3C should formalize an "interim public review" phase, which is 
a WD that is explicitly put out for review, and goes through many of the 
things that happen at LC -- notifying the reps, a blurb on the status 
pages, etc.  Just don't require the WG to make an official response to 
every issue.

	/r$

-- 
Rich Salz, Chief Security Architect
DataPower Technology                           http://www.datapower.com
XS40 XML Security Gateway   http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html