On Thu, 18 Aug 2005, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
> There are more failures from the self-constituted groups of amateur
> standards writers than there are successes. You are going to quote back
> to me the few notable successes from the amateurs but they are fewer
> than their counterparts. Don't confuse myth for math.
I presume hard numbers are what tells apart myth from math. Are there any
numbers to back up this claim? (That's a question out of genuine -- even
though amateur -- interest, really!)
Vladimir
