> >XQuery update extensions are on the way, but not there yet.
> And it's not an
> >XML format, unfortunately.
>
> Not to worry. One of the requirements of the XQuery Update
> Facility is
> that it share the XML syntax that XQuery itself provides (called
> XQueryX).
I did think of mentioning XQueryX. But I suspect the reason that they want
an XML format is that they want, for example, to be able to logically merge
two "diff" files, and I would think that would be mightily difficult to do
if the format is XQueryX.
Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/
