Robin Berjon wrote:
> Sure, though you don't have the nasty interactions between checked
> exceptions and method signatures. That's just scarily broken.
What are you referring to? I'm aware of no such interaction. You have to
declare that a method may throw a checked exception. This allows clients
to realize that the exception may be thrown for reasons beyond their
control and then to prepare to handle it. What's the problem with that?
--
Elliotte Rusty Harold
XML in a Nutshell 3rd Edition Just Published!
http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/xian3/
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0596007647/cafeaulaitA/ref=nosim
