Re: [xml-dev] DOM's javascript roots (was Re: [xml-dev] Have JDOM / XOM / etc. failed?)

From
Robin Berjon <>
To
Elliotte Harold <>
Date
2006-04-04T18:27:44Z
ID
<>
Thread
Re: [xml-dev] DOM's javascript roots (was Re: [xml-dev] Have JDOM / XOM / etc. failed?)
On Mar 31, 2006, at 22:45, Elliotte Harold wrote:
> Robin Berjon wrote:
>> Do you have an example of something in the DOM that hurts Java  
>> that was obviously done so that Javascript would work? In the  
>> other direction, you don't need to look any further than NodeList  
>> (not even counting the liveness).
>
> Of course. No method overloading. Think createElement,  
> createElementNS, etc. Java and C++ wouldn;t desing an API like that.

That's a red herring, you can trivially switch on arguments.length. I  
think that whatever constraints that brought them to do this were  
different. I'm not the OMG IDL specialist but could the overloading  
issues come from there? It has quite a few dragons that have bitten  
me in the past, notably concerning case-sensitivity.

-- 
Robin Berjon
    Senior Research Scientist
    Expway, http://expway.com/