Hi.
How about:
- object oriented architecture
- transaction oriented architecture
- message oriented architecture
- connection oriented architecture
- communication oriented architecture
- pipeline oriented architecture
I'm only half joking making this list. "Orienting" an architecture
towards something is only loosely meaningful according to any
definitive, measurable criteria. At the same time I don't think it's
meaningless at all. The buzzwords ultimately serve to get a wide swath
of developers paying attention to similar things at any given time.
---->N
.:||:._.:||:._.:||:._.:||:._.:||:._.:||:._.:||:._.:||:._.:||:._.:||:._.:
||:.
Nathan Young
CDC Site Design & Development->Interface Development Team
A: ncy1717
E:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Kay [mailto:]
> Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 8:54 AM
> To: 'Bullard, Claude L (Len)'; ;
>
> Subject: RE: [xml-dev] Re: Major Historical SOA Milestone Today
>
> > SOA isn't meaningless.
>
> I'll believe that when someone can point me to an architecture that is
> demonstrably *not* a service-oriented architecture. For the term to be
> meaningful, there must be things that are clearly outside the
> definition,
> and those things must be architectures.
>
> Michael Kay
> http://www.saxonica.com/
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
> initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
>
> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
> manager: <http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/index.php>
>
