Florent Georges wrote:
> Philippe Poulard wrote:
>
>
>>-Saxon's syntax :
>>
>
> collection('file:///c:/xslts_1_0_0/TestInputs?select=*.xsl;recurse=yes')
>
>>-Ant's syntax :
>><fileset dir="file:///c:/xslts_1_0_0/TestInputs"
>>includes="**/*.xsl"/>
>>-Why not using definitively the XPath syntax ?
>>
>
> file('file:///c:/xslts_1_0_0/TestInputs')//*[ends-with(name(.),'xsl')])
>
>>or
>>file('file:///c:/xslts_1_0_0/TestInputs')//*[@extension='xsl']
>>or whatever à la XPath ?
>
>
> Saxon's syntax is an "à la XPath" syntax, isn't it?
'file:///c:/xslts_1_0_0/TestInputs?select=*.xsl;recurse=yes'
this part is not, comparing to what I proposed
>
> Regards,
>
> --drkm
>
--
Cordialement,
///
(. .)
--------ooO--(_)--Ooo--------
| Philippe Poulard |
-----------------------------
http://reflex.gforge.inria.fr/
Have the RefleX !
