> >
> > As far as I can tell there are only three substantive points:
> >
> > - XML is more verbose than some other markup languages
> > - XSL may not be the best choice for every programming task
> > - XSL may or may not be a programming language
> >
> > The first two points are widely accepted.
>
> Then is not widely accepted that "XSL may or may not be a programming
> language"?
Do you honestly not understand the distinction between the first two
items and the last one? Or are you baiting me? I can't tell, and I
find your communication style very abrasive. Please forgive me if I'm
taking offense when I shouldn't be.
---->N
> Interesting...
>
> > ------------>N
> >
> >
> >
> .:||:._.:||:._.:||:._.:||:._.:||:._.:||:._.:||:._.:||:._.:||:.
> _.:||:._.:
> > ||:.
> >
> > Nathan Young
> > Cisco.com->Interface Development
> > A: ncy1717
> > E:
> >
>
> Juan R.
>
> Center for CANONICAL |SCIENCE)
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> _________
>
> XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS
> to support XML
> implementation and development. To minimize spam in the
> archives, you must
> subscribe before posting.
>
> [Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/
> Or unsubscribe:
> subscribe:
> List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
> List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php
>
