RE: [xml-dev] Xlink Isn't Dead

From
Len Bullard <>
To
'Alexander Johannesen' <>,
Date
2006-09-22T16:46:45Z
ID
<004301c6de66$b13e5300$8b04b4d8@c4u6h3>
Thread
RE: [xml-dev] Xlink Isn't Dead
http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ratcliffe/?p=171

You don't have to disbelieve.  You have to critically question requirements
to determine objectives.

len


From: Alexander Johannesen [mailto:] 

I think it was an attempt at trying to sway good honest XML folks into
the dark alleys of semantic data modelling, because if it's an W3C XML
standard, everyone will use it, right? *whistle*