Re: [xml-dev] Xlink Isn't Dead

From
Ben Trafford <>
To
Date
2006-09-25T15:55:27Z
ID
<>
Thread
Re: [xml-dev] Xlink Isn't Dead
At 11:51 AM 9/25/2006, James Fuller wrote:
>dont know if RDDL has some part to play here?

         The essential problem I have with RDDL is the requirement 
that roles be stated as URIs. I mean, that's fine if you're only 
trying to use it to define namespaces (its intended purpose), but not 
so good for things like CML, for example.

--->Ben