Michael Kay wrote:
> Two criticisms:
> (a) it's not namespace-safe (e.g. comparing name(x)=name(y) is thoroughly
> dubious)
>
Or is it, in fact, that using different prefixes for the same namespace
is dubious? :-)
> (b) It would make more sense to have separate template rules for elements
> and attributes. This will output an attribute as @a[1] which doesn't make
> much sense.
>
Oh, I'm happy to include any improvements that people want to
contribute. I thought
the guy wanted some code.
Cheers
Rick
