On 1/15/07, Richard Salz <> wrote:
> > HTTPS why:
> > Default to safe.
>
> Please define safe. Please be as technical as you can.
>
> /r$
Is hard, ill try
safe:
- protected from nake eye inspection of actual data HTTP move
- validate server identity, that can serve to avoid phising or DNS spoofing.
- protected content from malware javascript/html inyection
- validate client identity? (not idea about this, but I think is posible)
- cypher is strong against brute force
- cypher strong against password distribution problem (PKI dont need
that ...much)
Other than that. Again. Maybe was not soo a good idea, cause people
want fast porn. Not safe or private porn. Wait... bad analogy.
