There is some great stuff on the transition of DTDs to optional status
(and Charles G's fight against it) in Jon Bosak's closing keynote for XML
2006: http://2006.xmlconference.org/proceedings/162/presentation.html
Bob
On Thu, March 1, 2007 4:58 am, David Carlisle wrote:
>
>> Did DTD's grow up with SGML or were they added?
>
> They predated the S being added to SGML.
>
> http://www.sgmlsource.com/history/roots.htm
>
>
> The DCF GML User's Guide (IBM SH20-9160), which I wrote in 1978,
> includes the first published formal document type "descriptions"
> (DTDs),
>
> .....
>
>
>
> and of course the notion of a formal grammar against which a language
> could be parsed is a lot older than that.
>
>
> David
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
>
> XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS
> to support XML implementation and development. To minimize
> spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting.
>
> [Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/
> Or unsubscribe:
> subscribe:
> List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
> List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php
>
>
