xml-dev

← back

218 messages · 55 threads

# Subject From Date
00008 XSD - Difference between element ref and element type Valsalan, Unnikrishnan 2007-08-01 11:02
00019 [ANN] CodeSynthesis XSD 3.0.0 - Open-source XML Schema to C++ compiler Boris Kolpackov 2007-08-01 12:54
00018 Re: XML DTD/XSD parser library sought Boris Kolpackov 2007-08-01 13:05
00009 Re: [xml-dev] XSD - Difference between element ref and element type Fraser Goffin 2007-08-02 15:28
00035 Re: [xml-dev] XML Diff Philippe Poulard 2007-08-02 18:28
00043 RuleML-2007 Challenge - Extended Deadlines, 7th/17th August Adrian Paschke 2007-08-02 19:15
00034 A single, all-encompassing data validation language - good or bad for the marketplace? Costello, Roger L. 2007-08-02 20:18
00044 RE: [xml-dev] A single, all-encompassing data validation language - good or bad for the marketplace? Michael Kay 2007-08-02 20:37
00065 Re: [xml-dev] A single, all-encompassing data validation language - good or bad for the marketplace? [email protected] 2007-08-02 21:05
00054 Re: [xml-dev] A single, all-encompassing data validation language - good or bad for the marketplace? Jirka Kosek 2007-08-02 21:41
00020 Re: [xml-dev] Re: XML DTD/XSD parser library sought Jeremy H. Griffith 2007-08-02 22:14
00032 Re: [xml-dev] XML Diff Stefan Tilkov 2007-08-03 08:22
00031 Re: [xml-dev] A single, all-encompassing data validation language - good or bad for the marketplace? Andrew Welch 2007-08-03 10:14
00022 Regular expression not working "Víctor M. López Jaquero" 2007-08-03 11:43
00052 Re: [xml-dev] Regular expression not working Pete Cordell 2007-08-03 12:01
00066 Re: [xml-dev] A single, all-encompassing data validation language - good or bad for the marketplace? Anthony B. Coates (XML-Dev) 2007-08-03 13:57
00057 [Ann] RefleX : mastering XML with XML Philippe Poulard 2007-08-03 14:02
00064 Re: [xml-dev] A single, all-encompassing data validation language - good or bad for the marketplace? Andrew Welch 2007-08-03 14:05
00005 Re: [xml-dev] A single, all-encompassing data validation language - good or bad for the marketplace? Anthony B. Coates (XML-Dev) 2007-08-03 14:25
00012 Re: [xml-dev] A single, all-encompassing data validation language - good or bad for the marketplace? Andrew Welch 2007-08-03 14:58
00046 Re: [xml-dev] A single, all-encompassing data validation language - good or bad for the marketplace? Philippe Poulard 2007-08-03 15:01
00042 Re: [xml-dev] Regular expression not working David Carlisle 2007-08-03 15:50
00040 Re: [xml-dev] Regular expression not working "Víctor M. López Jaquero" 2007-08-03 16:25
00047 Re: [xml-dev] A single, all-encompassing data validation language - good or bad for the marketplace? Jirka Kosek 2007-08-03 16:30
00011 Re: [xml-dev] XML Diff Fraser Goffin 2007-08-04 14:41
00007 Re: [xml-dev] XML Diff Fraser Goffin 2007-08-04 14:49
00013 Re: [xml-dev] XML Diff Philippe Poulard 2007-08-05 16:20
00002 Semantic Web Strategies (September 30 - October 2 in San Jose) Ken North 2007-08-06 16:56
00017 Re: [xml-dev] A single, all-encompassing data validation language - good or bad for the marketplace? Chris Scott 2007-08-07 00:11
00000 RE: [xml-dev] A single, all-encompassing data validation language - good or bad for the marketplace? Michael Kay 2007-08-07 01:44
00038 RE: [xml-dev] A single, all-encompassing data validation language - good or bad for the marketplace? Amelia A Lewis 2007-08-07 02:20
00049 RE: [xml-dev] A single, all-encompassing data validation language - good or bad for the marketplace? Michael Kay 2007-08-07 04:11
00050 Re: [xml-dev] A single, all-encompassing data validation language - good or bad for the marketplace? Philippe Poulard 2007-08-07 11:54
00037 Re: [xml-dev] A single, all-encompassing data validation language - good or bad for the marketplace? Chris Scott 2007-08-07 12:47
00004 RE: [xml-dev] A single, all-encompassing data validation language - good or bad for the marketplace? Michael Kay 2007-08-07 13:09
00014 RE: [xml-dev] A single, all-encompassing data validation language - good or bad for the marketplace? Costello, Roger L. 2007-08-07 13:33
00006 RE: [xml-dev] A single, all-encompassing data validation language - good or bad for the marketplace? Paul Kiel 2007-08-07 15:08
00010 Re: [xml-dev] A question about the future of efficient XML Stephen D. Williams 2007-08-07 16:35
00058 Re: [xml-dev] A single, all-encompassing data validation language - good or bad for the marketplace? Fraser Goffin 2007-08-07 17:37
00061 Re: [xml-dev] A single, all-encompassing data validation language - good or bad for the marketplace? Chris Scott 2007-08-07 18:25
00030 Re: [xml-dev] A single, all-encompassing data validation language - good or bad for the marketplace? Philippe Poulard 2007-08-07 21:46
00023 RE: [xml-dev] A single, all-encompassing data validation language - good or bad for the marketplace? Amelia A Lewis 2007-08-08 00:01
00026 RE: [xml-dev] A single, all-encompassing data validation language - good or bad for the marketplace? Michael Kay 2007-08-08 03:00
00027 Re: [xml-dev] A single, all-encompassing data validation language - good or bad for the marketplace? bryan rasmussen 2007-08-08 09:10
00062 Re: [xml-dev] A single, all-encompassing data validation language - good or bad for the marketplace? bryan rasmussen 2007-08-08 09:29
00056 XML Feeds vs SQL Queries Len Bullard 2007-08-08 17:35
00067 Re: [xml-dev] XML Feeds vs SQL Queries Peter Hunsberger 2007-08-08 17:48
00053 RE: [xml-dev] XML Feeds vs SQL Queries Len Bullard 2007-08-08 17:55
00025 StAX & XInclude Joerg Hohwiller 2007-08-08 18:40
00028 Re: [xml-dev] StAX & XInclude James Fuller 2007-08-08 18:51
00063 Re: [xml-dev] XML Feeds vs SQL Queries Jonathan Robie 2007-08-08 20:23
00055 RE: [xml-dev] XML Feeds vs SQL Queries Len Bullard 2007-08-08 21:23
00059 Re: [xml-dev] StAX & XInclude Philippe Poulard 2007-08-08 22:31
00060 Re: [xml-dev] A single, all-encompassing data validation language - good or bad for the marketplace? Anthony B. Coates (XML-Dev) 2007-08-09 09:45
00029 Re: [xml-dev] A single, all-encompassing data validation language - good or bad for the marketplace? Andrew Welch 2007-08-09 10:55
00024 Re: [xml-dev] A single, all-encompassing data validation language - good or bad for the marketplace? Anthony B. Coates (XML-Dev) 2007-08-09 11:16
00033 RE: [xml-dev] A single, all-encompassing data validation language - good or bad for the marketplace? Michael Kay 2007-08-09 11:51
00021 Re: [xml-dev] A single, all-encompassing data validation language - good or bad for the marketplace? Anthony B. Coates (XML-Dev) 2007-08-09 12:07
00051 Re: [xml-dev] XML Feeds vs SQL Queries Jonathan Robie 2007-08-09 14:36
00036 RE: [xml-dev] XML Feeds vs SQL Queries Len Bullard 2007-08-09 14:54
00003 Re: [xml-dev] [Summary] Schematron Best Practice: Embed Schematron into a Grammar-Based Language? Or Keep Separate? Rita Shen 2007-08-10 01:35
00015 Re: [xml-dev] [Summary] Schematron Best Practice: Embed Schematron into a Grammar-Based Language? Or Keep Separate? Bjoern Hoehrmann 2007-08-10 02:08
00016 Re: [xml-dev] [Summary] Schematron Best Practice: Embed Schematron into a Grammar-Based Language? Or Keep Separate? Rita Shen 2007-08-10 02:32
00001 [ANN] Axl Library 0.4.7 "Bellísima Asturias" release is ready! Francis Brosnan Blazquez 2007-08-10 07:34
00039 XML for functions tom tom 2007-08-10 14:12
00048 include schemalocation Amanpreet Singh 2007-08-10 14:21
00041 Re: [xml-dev] XML Feeds vs SQL Queries Ken North 2007-08-10 16:32
00045 XML Schema and the Unique Particle Attribution (UPA) rule Azariah Jeyakumar 2007-08-10 21:21
00120 RE: [xml-dev] XML Schema and the Unique Particle Attribution (UPA) rule Michael Kay 2007-08-10 21:31
00134 RE: [xml-dev] XML Schema and the Unique Particle Attribution (UPA) rule Klotz, Leigh 2007-08-10 21:38
00091 Mark Your Calendars-17 September 2007- OpenCSA MS Plenary and SCA TCs F2F Dee Schur 2007-08-10 22:03
00076 Re: [xml-dev] XML Schema and the Unique Particle Attribution (UPA) rule Philippe Poulard 2007-08-10 22:14
00077 RecommendedTutorials please! Danny Ayers 2007-08-11 07:46
00090 Re: Recommended Semantic Web Tutorials please! (was Re: RecommendedTutorials please!) Danny Ayers 2007-08-11 07:55
00135 Results of Open XML balloting at INCITS [email protected] 2007-08-11 19:32
00118 Re: [xml-dev] XML for functions Chris Scott 2007-08-12 01:44
00133 Re: [xml-dev] Results of Open XML balloting at INCITS Robin Cover 2007-08-12 04:22
00122 RE: [xml-dev] Results of Open XML balloting at INCITS Michael Kay 2007-08-12 09:03
00107 RE: [xml-dev] Results of Open XML balloting at INCITS Robin Cover 2007-08-12 13:40
00095 RE: [xml-dev] Results of Open XML balloting at INCITS Len Bullard 2007-08-12 14:25
00155 RE: [xml-dev] Results of Open XML balloting at INCITS Michael Kay 2007-08-12 14:59
00164 RE: [xml-dev] Results of Open XML balloting at INCITS Rick Jelliffe 2007-08-12 16:06
00165 RE: [xml-dev] Results of Open XML balloting at INCITS Jim Melton 2007-08-12 16:37
00154 RE: [xml-dev] Results of Open XML balloting at INCITS Rick Jelliffe 2007-08-12 18:51
00097 RE: [xml-dev] Results of Open XML balloting at INCITS Len Bullard 2007-08-12 21:40
00106 RE: [xml-dev] Results of Open XML balloting at INCITS Len Bullard 2007-08-12 21:51
00093 RE: [xml-dev] Results of Open XML balloting at INCITS Len Bullard 2007-08-12 22:49
00108 RE: [xml-dev] Results of Open XML balloting at INCITS Michael Kay 2007-08-12 23:03
00092 RE: [xml-dev] Results of Open XML balloting at INCITS G. Ken Holman 2007-08-13 00:19
00110 RE: [xml-dev] Results of Open XML balloting at INCITS Len Bullard 2007-08-13 02:14
00166 RE: [xml-dev] Results of Open XML balloting at INCITS Len Bullard 2007-08-13 02:31
00153 RE: [xml-dev] Results of Open XML balloting at INCITS Melvin Chin 2007-08-13 03:27
00152 RE: [xml-dev] Results of Open XML balloting at INCITS Rick Jelliffe 2007-08-13 05:36
00167 RE: [xml-dev] Results of Open XML balloting at INCITS Melvin Chin 2007-08-13 06:58
00109 Performing XQuery in Firefox via Berkeley DB XML Brett Zamir 2007-08-13 07:14
00094 PAX: Why OOXML and ODF are inadquate bases for a forward-looking general purpose office format Rick Jelliffe 2007-08-13 09:54
00105 Re: [xml-dev] PAX: Why OOXML and ODF are inadquate bases for a forward-looking general purpose office format Andrew Welch 2007-08-13 10:37
00096 Re: [xml-dev] PAX: Why OOXML and ODF are inadquate bases for a forward-looking general purpose office format bryan rasmussen 2007-08-13 10:57
00131 Re: [xml-dev] PAX: Why OOXML and ODF are inadquate bases for a forward-looking general purpose office format Rick Jelliffe 2007-08-13 11:18
00123 RE: [xml-dev] Results of Open XML balloting at INCITS Len Bullard 2007-08-13 13:02
00078 Validating Bulk XML Data Ravindra Rao 2007-08-13 16:07
00089 RE: [xml-dev] Results of Open XML balloting at INCITS Jim Melton 2007-08-13 16:50
00088 RE: [xml-dev] Results of Open XML balloting at INCITS Rick Jelliffe 2007-08-13 19:35
00079 RE: [xml-dev] A single, all-encompassing data validation language - good or bad for the marketplace? [email protected] 2007-08-13 20:27
00121 RE: [xml-dev] Results of Open XML balloting at INCITS Len Bullard 2007-08-13 20:31
00132 Standard means to convert text to XML? Brett Zamir 2007-08-14 00:06
00119 RE: [xml-dev] Validating Bulk XML Data Michael Kay 2007-08-14 23:58
00136 RE: [xml-dev] Standard means to convert text to XML? Michael Kay 2007-08-14 23:58
00161 RE: [xml-dev] Results of Open XML balloting at INCITS Michael Kay 2007-08-14 23:58
00146 RE: [xml-dev] Results of Open XML balloting at INCITS Rick Jelliffe 2007-08-15 00:29
00098 Re: [xml-dev] Results of Open XML balloting at INCITS Bjoern Hoehrmann 2007-08-15 02:19
00116 Re: [xml-dev] Standard means to convert text to XML? Bryce K. Nielsen 2007-08-15 07:45
00115 Re: [xml-dev] Standard means to convert text to XML? bryan rasmussen 2007-08-15 08:38
00100 Re: [xml-dev] Validating Bulk XML Data Andrew Welch 2007-08-15 08:58
00144 Re: [xml-dev] Standard means to convert text to XML? Brett Zamir 2007-08-15 09:04
00162 RE: [xml-dev] Standard means to convert text to XML? [email protected] 2007-08-15 09:22
00149 RE: [xml-dev] Validating Bulk XML Data Ravindra Rao 2007-08-15 09:39
00160 Re: [xml-dev] Standard means to convert text to XML? bryan rasmussen 2007-08-15 09:47
00073 RE: [xml-dev] Validating Bulk XML Data Michael Kay 2007-08-15 12:53
00082 Programme Announced for the Open Standards Forum 2007 Jane Harnad 2007-08-15 12:55
00138 RE: [xml-dev] Validating Bulk XML Data [email protected] 2007-08-15 14:09
00130 RE: [xml-dev] Validating Bulk XML Data Ravindra Rao 2007-08-15 14:43
00128 RE: [xml-dev] Validating Bulk XML Data Robert Koberg 2007-08-15 14:48
00139 OASIS forms six committees to simplify SOA Jonathan Robie 2007-08-15 20:34
00081 Re: [xml-dev] XML Feeds vs SQL Queries Elliotte Harold 2007-08-16 11:04
00075 XML vs relational database Sylvain LOISEAU 2007-08-16 11:46
00083 RE: [xml-dev] XML Feeds vs SQL Queries Michael Kay 2007-08-16 12:17
00070 RE: [xml-dev] XML vs relational database Michael Kay 2007-08-16 12:19
00087 Re: [xml-dev] XML vs relational database Sylvain LOISEAU 2007-08-16 12:49
00068 Re: [xml-dev] XML vs relational database Anthony B. Coates (XML-Dev) 2007-08-16 13:10
00126 RE: [xml-dev] XML vs relational database Michael Kay 2007-08-16 13:17
00141 Re: [xml-dev] XML Feeds vs SQL Queries Jonathan Robie 2007-08-16 13:37
00142 RE: [xml-dev] XML vs relational database [email protected] 2007-08-16 13:59
00125 Re: [xml-dev] XML vs relational database Sylvain LOISEAU 2007-08-16 14:01
00072 RE: [xml-dev] XML vs relational database Len Bullard 2007-08-16 14:29
00074 RE: [xml-dev] XML vs relational database Jim Melton 2007-08-16 15:30
00080 Re: [xml-dev] XML vs relational database Jim Melton 2007-08-16 15:47
00084 RE: [xml-dev] XML vs relational database Alessandro Triglia 2007-08-16 16:00
00150 Re: [xml-dev] Standard means to convert text to XML? Philippe Poulard 2007-08-16 16:06
00157 Re: [xml-dev] XML vs relational database Ken North 2007-08-16 17:08
00114 Re: [xml-dev] XML Feeds vs SQL Queries Ken North 2007-08-16 17:09
00101 RE: [xml-dev] XML vs relational database Len Bullard 2007-08-16 18:13
00104 Re: [xml-dev] XML vs relational database Ken North 2007-08-16 21:47
00111 Re: [xml-dev] XML vs relational database Jim Melton 2007-08-16 22:40
00158 RE: [xml-dev] XML vs relational database Len Bullard 2007-08-17 00:08
00148 RE: [xml-dev] XML vs relational database Len Bullard 2007-08-17 00:26
00163 Re: [xml-dev] XML vs relational database Rick Marshall 2007-08-17 01:57
00145 Announce: Hands-on Code list training and/or Universal Business Language training - October 2007 (XML-Dev) G. Ken Holman 2007-08-17 02:01
00103 [Ann] freebXML Registry version 3.1 release Farrukh Najmi 2007-08-18 20:42
00112 Update Your Online Account Natwest Bank Plc 2007-08-20 10:05
00159 libxslt / libxml2 - which one to use Senthil Nathan 2007-08-20 11:48
00147 libxslt / libxml2 - which one to use Senthil Nathan 2007-08-20 11:59
00151 Re: [xml-dev] libxslt / libxml2 - which one to use Pete Cordell 2007-08-20 17:13
00113 Only 11 days until XML 2007 deadline David Megginson 2007-08-20 17:37
00156 Only 11 days until XML 2007 deadline David Megginson 2007-08-20 17:37
00102 Re: [xml-dev] XML vs relational database Tei 2007-08-21 10:47
00117 Re: [xml-dev] XML vs relational database Rick Marshall 2007-08-21 12:34
00099 Re: [xml-dev] XML vs relational database Tei 2007-08-21 15:01
00143 Hermes Messaging Gateway v2.0 (H2O) Community Website Launched Patrick Yee 2007-08-22 09:43
00124 Re: [xml-dev] XML vs relational database Elliotte Harold 2007-08-22 12:21
00071 Re: [xml-dev] XML vs relational database Rick Marshall 2007-08-22 12:33
00085 Webswell Connect 2.1 - open source AS2, ebxml and SOA integration tool is released Ladislav Urban 2007-08-22 17:47
00086 Backward and forward compatible schemas ... Relax NG --> Yes ... XML Schema --> No Costello, Roger L. 2007-08-23 19:41
00069 Re: [xml-dev] Backward and forward compatible schemas ... Relax NG --> Yes ... XML Schema --> No bryan rasmussen 2007-08-23 20:07
00127 Re: [xml-dev] XML Feeds vs SQL Queries Elliotte Rusty Harold 2007-08-23 21:06
00140 Re: [xml-dev] Backward and forward compatible schemas ... Relax NG --> Yes ... XML Schema --> No [email protected] 2007-08-23 23:44
00129 RE: [xml-dev] Backward and forward compatible schemas ... Relax NG --> Yes ... XML Schema --> No Dave Orchard 2007-08-24 05:33
00137 Re: [xml-dev] Backward and forward compatible schemas ... Relax NG --> Yes ... XML Schema --> No Anthony B. Coates (XML-Dev) 2007-08-24 08:27
00195 Re: [xml-dev] Backward and forward compatible schemas ... Relax NG --> Yes ... XML Schema --> No Philippe Poulard 2007-08-24 09:39
00202 RE: [xml-dev] Backward and forward compatible schemas ... Relax NG --> Yes ... XML Schema --> No [email protected] 2007-08-24 12:52
00176 [Summary] Backward and forward compatible schemas ... Relax NG --> Yes ... XML Schema -->Yes Costello, Roger L. 2007-08-24 15:31
00169 Re: [xml-dev] [Summary] Backward and forward compatible schemas ... Relax NG --> Yes ... XML Schema -->Yes [email protected] 2007-08-24 16:09
00170 RE: [xml-dev] [Summary] Backward and forward compatible schemas ... Relax NG --> Yes ... XML Schema -->Yes Dave Orchard 2007-08-24 16:13
00175 Re: [xml-dev] [Summary] Backward and forward compatible schemas ... Relax NG --> Yes ... XML Schema -->Yes Stephen Green 2007-08-24 18:35
00203 Validation help Carlos Narváez 2007-08-25 05:06
00193 RE: [xml-dev] Validation help Michael Kay 2007-08-25 07:47
00201 xsd:enumeration, preserve and attribute value normalization Shlomo Yona 2007-08-26 08:21
00197 RE: [xml-dev] xsd:enumeration, preserve and attribute value normalization Michael Kay 2007-08-26 12:36
00187 RE: [xml-dev] Backward and forward compatible schemas ... Relax NG --> Yes ... XML Schema --> No Rick Jelliffe 2007-08-27 06:39
00180 Re: [xml-dev] Backward and forward compatible schemas ... Relax NG --> Yes ... XML Schema --> No bryan rasmussen 2007-08-27 08:15
00211 Re: [xml-dev] Backward and forward compatible schemas ... Relax NG --> Yes ... XML Schema --> No Fraser Goffin 2007-08-27 08:46
00214 RE: [xml-dev] Backward and forward compatible schemas ... Relax N G --> Yes ... XML Schema --> No Len Bullard 2007-08-27 12:58
00215 RE: [xml-dev] Backward and forward compatible schemas ... Relax NG --> Yes ... XML Schema --> No [email protected] 2007-08-27 13:17
00210 Re: [xml-dev] Backward and forward compatible schemas ... Relax NG --> Yes ... XML Schema --> No [email protected] 2007-08-27 13:23
00182 Designing Schemas for Backward and Forward Compatibility - XML Schema, Relax NG, Schematron Costello, Roger L. 2007-08-27 20:32
00186 Re: [xml-dev] Designing Schemas for Backward and Forward Compatibility - XML Schema, Relax NG, Schematron [email protected] 2007-08-27 22:19
00178 xsd:any and its processContents and namespace attribute Shlomo Yona 2007-08-28 07:16
00188 Re: Designing Schemas for Backward and Forward Compatibility - XML Schema, Relax NG, Schematron Niklas Gustavsson 2007-08-28 13:05
00177 RE: [xml-dev] Re: Designing Schemas for Backward and Forward Compatibility - XML Schema, Relax NG, Schematron Costello, Roger L. 2007-08-28 13:36
00190 [ANN] Axl Library 0.4.8 "fly with the black swan release" is ready! Francis Brosnan Blazquez 2007-08-28 13:44
00216 REST Eye for the SOA Guy Jonathan Robie 2007-08-28 14:25
00209 Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML? Jonathan Robie 2007-08-28 16:14
00208 RE: [xml-dev] Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML? Len Bullard 2007-08-28 16:33
00217 Re: [xml-dev] Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML? Rick Jelliffe 2007-08-28 17:15
00189 Re: [xml-dev] Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML? Jonathan Robie 2007-08-28 17:21
00179 Re: [xml-dev] Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML? Jonathan Robie 2007-08-28 17:39
00199 Re: [xml-dev] Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML? Jim Melton 2007-08-28 18:37
00185 Re: [xml-dev] Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML? Stephen Green 2007-08-28 18:39
00181 RE: [xml-dev] Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML? Len Bullard 2007-08-28 18:42
00198 RE: [xml-dev] Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML? Len Bullard 2007-08-28 18:57
00171 Re: [xml-dev] Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML? Jonathan Robie 2007-08-28 19:29
00174 RE: [xml-dev] Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML? [email protected] 2007-08-28 19:55
00173 RE: [xml-dev] Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML? Len Bullard 2007-08-28 20:08
00172 RE: [xml-dev] Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML? Len Bullard 2007-08-28 21:00
00196 Re: [xml-dev] Backward and forward compatible schemas ... Relax NG --> Yes ... XML Schema --> No David Carver 2007-08-28 22:24
00200 Re: [xml-dev] Backward and forward compatible schemas ... Relax NG --> Yes ... XML Schema --> No Fraser Goffin 2007-08-28 23:12
00194 Re: [xml-dev] Backward and forward compatible schemas ... Relax NG --> Yes ... XML Schema --> No Fraser Goffin 2007-08-28 23:23
00204 RE: [xml-dev] Backward and forward compatible schemas ... Relax NG --> Yes ... XML Schema --> No Len Bullard 2007-08-29 02:08
00212 Re: [xml-dev] Backward and forward compatible schemas ... Relax NG --> Yes ... XML Schema --> No Fraser Goffin 2007-08-29 13:32
00206 RE: [xml-dev] Backward and forward compatible schemas ... Relax N G --> Yes ... XML Schema --> No Len Bullard 2007-08-29 13:52
00183 Utility methods on DOM elements for key/keyref/unique Sjoerd Visscher 2007-08-29 17:39
00192 DEADLINE: XML 2007 proposals due tomorrow David Megginson 2007-08-30 16:54
00191 W3C XML Query Update 1.0 last call working draft - please review Liam Quin 2007-08-30 16:55
00184 Re: [xml-dev] Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML? Jonathan Robie 2007-08-30 21:16
00205 RE: [xml-dev] Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML? Len Bullard 2007-08-30 21:53
00213 Re: [xml-dev] Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML? Jonathan Robie 2007-08-31 13:40
00207 RE: [xml-dev] Microsoft buys the Swedish vote on OOXML? Len Bullard 2007-08-31 14:43
00168 Political opinions and this list Mark C. Allman 2007-09-01 03:05