> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard Tobin [mailto:]
> Sent: Friday, September 28, 2007 16:25
> To:
> Subject: Re: [xml-dev] [Summary] UTF-8 Question: e with acute
> accent should require two bytes, right?
>
> In article <003e01c801fc$9df86ff0$8901a8c0@aldebaran> you write:
>
> >It is not correct to say that a Unicode character can be either an
> >"ASCII character" or a "non-ASCII character". It is better
> to say that
> >some Unicode characters (those with codes below 128) have a
> >corresponding character in ASCII.
>
> On what do you base this assertion? Why do you think the
> ASCII characters are not the same characters that appear in
> Unicode?
That's not what I said nor what I think.
Alessandro
