Jonathan,
>> Let i guess: you define SQL as matching to template
>> 'EnglishWord Parameter EnglishWord Parameter EnglishWord Parameter', i.e.
>> 'select ... from ... where ...', and nothing else.
JR> Well, there's a BNF that defines SQL
People define SQL instead of BNF.
As i already said, i propose to overrun today's boundary.
JR> I don't think Rick Marshall defined SQL, I suspect that H2 does that.
Jonathan, i don't want to offend you, but you forge concept:
RM>> Don't call it SQL - it's simply not.
DT>> Arguments are absent again.
DT>> Let i guess: you define SQL as matching to template
DT>> 'EnglishWord Parameter EnglishWord Parameter EnglishWord Parameter', i.e.
DT>> 'select ... from ... where ...', and nothing else.
Speach was about reason of you _own_ opinion,
about how you define SQL for _youself_,
about how you will vote (or would vote, or might could vote) in organization of standartization.
Dmitry Turin
SQL5 (5.5.0) http://sql50.euro.ru
HTML6 (6.4.3) http://html60.euro.ru
Unicode7 (7.2.0) http://unicode70.euro.ru
Computer2 (2.0.2) http://computer20.euro.ru
