Re: [xml-dev] Element equivalence under XML Namespaces

>
> No, it's not. Well-formedness is defined in the XML specification, and this
> doesn't know anything about namespaces;

Not exactly, it knows some things about Namespaces but not enough to
specify semantic matching - I think it's sort of weird that. Things
that it knows that I can remember:

1. : should be used in definition of namespaces.

2. XML or xml is reserved. I don't think xmlns is defined as a
namespace declaration anywhere but it seems sort of implied.

Cheers,

Bryan Rasmussen