G. Ken Holman wrote:
> Hold the phone here ... NVDL is not just for the situation where one
> finds the semantics available in one schema language preferable over
> that of the other and they feel obliged to use both.
>
> Rather than writing an über-schema covering all of the possibilities
> found in a single instance one can use NVDL to choreograph the
> dispatching of portions of one's document to different schemas using
> the same schema language for each vocabulary.
>
> I wouldn't want NVDL judged only on its merits of allowing multiple
> different languages to be used at the same time. Then it becomes a
> "mine is better than yours" argument on the languages ignoring what I
> think is the prime motivation for NVDL: dispatching ... hence the name!
Yes, this is very helpful.
Jonathan
