Michael Kay wrote:
>> I'm guessing this requires a level of sophistication more
>> common on this list (yes, I use multiple schema languages)
>> than in the world as a whole. This doesn't feel like
>> something heading toward mainstream.
>>
>> Jonathan
>>
>
> Quite. I think any instance where users use more than one schema language
> should be taken as evidence of a deficiency in one or more of those
> languages.
>
Except people make schemas out of pre-existing vocabularies which use
schema languages out of their control.
How is it a deficiency in XSD that DAISY uses DTDs, for example?
Cheers
Rick Jelliffe
