I think WikiPedia is not a reliable source of information sometimes,
as it can be edited by any person. Though I like it very much, and get
an indication of what something means.
to me, dictionary.com is a more reliable source for english dictionary
related information, as it is maintained by professional language
specialists.
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 6:31 PM, Alexander Johannesen
<> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 14:54, Mukul Gandhi <> wrote:
>> I am convinced about the correctness of these definitions (taken, from
>> www.dictionary.com, which I am following since many years, and regard
>> highly).
>
> And the WikiPedia entry? (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acronym)
>
>
> Alex
> --
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Project Wrangler, SOA, Information Alchemist, UX, RESTafarian, Topic Maps
> ------------------------------------------ http://shelter.nu/blog/ --------
--
Regards,
Mukul Gandhi
