On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 8:36 AM, Michael Kay <> wrote:
>>
>> I have used Java only occasionally and even that was many years ago.
>>
>> Good support of generics is required for the inplementation
>> of a finger tree.
>
> Generics don't allow you to do anything that you can't do without them. They
> only allow you to do it in a way that is more strongly typed.
>
Thanks for the correction, I should have said:
" Good support of generics is required for an ellegant inplementation
of a finger tree."
Probably this is my own personal problem, but I find using the "
'object' type" ugly.
Anyway, an ugly implementation is still better than none at all.
--
Cheers,
Dimitre Novatchev
---------------------------------------
Truly great madness cannot be achieved without significant intelligence.
---------------------------------------
To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk
-------------------------------------
Never fight an inanimate object
-------------------------------------
You've achieved success in your field when you don't know whether what
you're doing is work or play
