Pete Cordell wrote:
> Original Message From: "Rick Jelliffe" <>
>
>> xsi:type addresses his issue. All it does is say "look what
>> I found", with admittedly clever, rococo elaborateness, not "here is
>> what you can do".
>
> No need for the attitude.
Sorry, I wasn't criticizing you or your solution, I was just rolling my
eyes at XSD.
> And rather than directly answering Ian's concern, I was more directly
> motivated by answering your comment:
Sorry twice, then!
> Even if it is not something he is not prepared to do, it is a
> documented avenue of what does not work, which in engineering can be
> as important as documenting what does work!
+1
> I am definitely not saying "look at my great clever solution. Aren't
> I wonderful?"
Then let me say it, by way of apology!
Cheers
Rick
