I'd be very surprised if JDOM cares what it finds in an element name: I
suspect that if the XML parser accepts XML 1.05 style names, then JDOM will
accept them too. But I might be wrong. Do you have any evidence to the
contrary?
Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Klotz, Leigh [mailto:]
> Sent: 19 March 2009 23:16
> To:
> Subject: [xml-dev] Whither JDOM?
>
> I sent a note to the jdom-interest list about JDOM and XML
> 1.0 (5th) production rules for element names, and noticed it
> didn't make it to the archives. Then I noticed nothing's new
> in the archives since January.
> A few quick web searches turned up no tea-leaf reading, and I
> didn't see any discussion here either.
>
> So, anybody have ideas what's going on, and if it's nothing
> good, for the prospects of getting JDOM updated?
>
> Leigh.
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> _________
>
> XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by
> OASIS to support XML implementation and development. To
> minimize spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting.
>
> [Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/
> Or unsubscribe:
> subscribe: List archive:
> http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
> List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php
>
