On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 04:01:38PM -0400, Robert Koberg wrote:
> I wish it weren't so, believe me. But follow some javascript oriented
> lists. Look for support for XSL in the popular (even unpopular) JS
> libraries.
It's true that the javaScript interfaces to XSLT are sucky. I
think this an area W3C (i.e. us) should have standardised.
This doesn't mean no-one is using XSL. The popular JS libraries
don't support PNG or JPEG images either - try asking for the
number of unique colours in the image, or a histogram, or even
the actual image dimensions - but it would be crazy to assumes this
means that images are not used on the Web.
The biggest change recently was that Opera 8 and later support
client-side XSLT. One does have still to support server-side
translation for things like the google Web crawler, and maybe mobile
devices. Netscape Navigator, IE, Mozilla, all supported it for years.
So I think we may see increased uptake.
Liam
--
Liam Quin, W3C XML Activity Lead, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/
http://www.holoweb.net/~liam/ * http://www.fromoldbooks.org/
