xml-dev

← back

157 messages · 30 threads

# Subject From Date
00002 [ANN] Complete Balisage 2009 Program posted B Tommie Usdin 2009-07-01 22:47
00003 interesting: xmlvm Robert Koberg 2009-07-02 03:11
00025 What entities do you use for common XML dialects? bryan rasmussen 2009-07-06 07:14
00028 Re: [xml-dev] generate common xml shema from multiple xml instances bryan rasmussen 2009-07-06 08:13
00014 [ann] oXygen XML Editor 10.3 George Cristian Bina 2009-07-06 09:00
00007 targetNamespace vs default namespace REV Tamas 2009-07-06 15:35
00010 RE: [xml-dev] targetNamespace vs default namespace Michael Kay 2009-07-06 16:05
00011 Re: [xml-dev] targetNamespace vs default namespace Pete Cordell 2009-07-06 16:29
00029 Re: [xml-dev] targetNamespace vs default namespace Pete Cordell 2009-07-06 18:37
00024 Re: [xml-dev] targetNamespace vs default namespace Anne Thomas Manes 2009-07-06 23:03
00031 DITA in practice Michael Hahn 2009-07-07 03:15
00022 RE: [xml-dev] targetNamespace vs default namespace Michael Kay 2009-07-07 07:50
00009 XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed? Jonathan Robie 2009-07-07 12:01
00012 Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed? Dan Brickley 2009-07-07 12:06
00030 Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed? [email protected] 2009-07-07 12:15
00023 RE: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed? Meadows, Philip 2009-07-07 12:20
00026 Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed? Dan Brickley 2009-07-07 12:25
00027 Re: [xml-dev] Separate data from rules ... is the XML Schema 1.1 <assert> element a step backwards? bryan rasmussen 2009-07-07 13:19
00013 Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed? Robert Koberg 2009-07-07 13:26
00008 Re: [xml-dev] Separate data from rules ... is the XML Schema 1.1 <assert> element a step backwards? bryan rasmussen 2009-07-07 13:30
00015 Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed? Jonathan Robie 2009-07-07 14:40
00006 Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed? Dan Brickley 2009-07-07 14:45
00021 Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed? [email protected] 2009-07-08 04:50
00016 Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed? [email protected] 2009-07-08 08:21
00001 Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed? Jesper Tverskov 2009-07-08 08:54
00004 RE: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed? Michael Kay 2009-07-08 09:19
00005 Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed? COUTHURES Alain 2009-07-08 10:04
00000 svrl:schematron-output - transformation to HTML available? Michael Ludwig 2009-07-08 12:41
00017 Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed? Simon St.Laurent 2009-07-08 14:54
00020 Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed? Simon St.Laurent 2009-07-08 15:01
00018 Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed? Laurens van den Oever 2009-07-08 15:41
00019 HTML 5 syntax Amelia A Lewis 2009-07-08 16:35
00084 Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed? Jonathan Robie 2009-07-08 17:52
00098 RE: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed? Jim Tivy 2009-07-08 18:51
00055 Metalink Download Description Format (XML) Anthony Bryan 2009-07-08 19:12
00040 Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed? Kurt Cagle 2009-07-08 19:28
00041 Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed? David Orchard 2009-07-08 19:46
00054 Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed? Simon St.Laurent 2009-07-08 19:48
00099 Re: [xml-dev] Metalink Download Description Format (XML) Anthony Bryan 2009-07-08 20:11
00082 RE: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed? Michael Kay 2009-07-08 20:54
00097 Do namespaces address all use cases well Jim Tivy 2009-07-08 21:07
00086 Re: [xml-dev] Do namespaces address all use cases well COUTHURES Alain 2009-07-08 21:16
00071 RE: [xml-dev] Do namespaces address all use cases well Jim Tivy 2009-07-08 21:20
00059 Balisage Attendees: Do a Poster! Deborah Aleyne Lapeyre 2009-07-08 21:26
00119 Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed? Kurt Cagle 2009-07-08 21:30
00128 Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed? David Orchard 2009-07-08 21:43
00129 RE: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed? Michael Kay 2009-07-08 22:14
00118 Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed? Kurt Cagle 2009-07-08 22:15
00061 Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed? Michael Ludwig 2009-07-08 23:13
00070 Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed? Michael Ludwig 2009-07-09 00:00
00057 Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed? Kurt Cagle 2009-07-09 00:17
00072 Re: [xml-dev] Do namespaces address all use cases well [email protected] 2009-07-09 06:22
00056 Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed? Andrew Welch 2009-07-09 08:15
00074 Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed? David Orchard 2009-07-09 08:23
00130 RE: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed? Michael Kay 2009-07-09 08:38
00117 RE: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed? Michael Kay 2009-07-09 08:53
00116 Re: [xml-dev] Do namespaces address all use cases well nico 2009-07-09 09:31
00131 Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed? Julian Reschke 2009-07-09 09:40
00073 Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed? Pete Cordell 2009-07-09 09:43
00058 Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed? Michael Ludwig 2009-07-09 10:19
00069 Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed? Andrew Welch 2009-07-09 10:23
00060 RE: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed? Michael Kay 2009-07-09 10:25
00095 Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed? Andrew Welch 2009-07-09 10:30
00087 RE: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed? Richard Salz 2009-07-09 10:58
00042 Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed? Pete Cordell 2009-07-09 11:30
00053 Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed? Michael Ludwig 2009-07-09 11:35
00052 RE: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed? Michael Kay 2009-07-09 12:01
00043 Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed? Michael Ludwig 2009-07-09 13:07
00085 Time for 4ML? Christopher R. Maden 2009-07-09 13:30
00096 Re: [xml-dev] Time for 4ML? Manos Batsis 2009-07-09 13:39
00083 Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed? Dylan Thomas 2009-07-09 14:28
00100 Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed? Peter Hunsberger 2009-07-09 14:30
00125 Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed? Michael Ludwig 2009-07-09 15:09
00110 Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed? Aad Kamsteeg 2009-07-09 15:29
00062 Re: [xml-dev] Separate data from rules ... is the XML Schema 1.1 <assert> element a step backwards? C. M. Sperberg-McQueen 2009-07-09 20:13
00080 RE: [xml-dev] Do namespaces address all use cases well Jim Tivy 2009-07-09 21:05
00079 RE: [xml-dev] Do namespaces address all use cases well Jim Tivy 2009-07-09 21:20
00064 RE: [xml-dev] Time for 4ML? Jim Tivy 2009-07-09 21:23
00108 RE: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed? Jim Tivy 2009-07-09 21:25
00126 Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed? Peter Hunsberger 2009-07-09 22:04
00113 Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed? B Tommie Usdin 2009-07-09 22:12
00124 RE: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed? Jim Tivy 2009-07-09 22:54
00037 Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed? C. M. Sperberg-McQueen 2009-07-09 22:55
00046 Namespace use cases Micah Dubinko 2009-07-10 00:35
00102 RE: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed? Len Bullard 2009-07-10 00:42
00094 RE: Namespace use cases Jim Tivy 2009-07-10 00:59
00092 Re: [xml-dev] RE: Namespace use cases Robert Koberg 2009-07-10 01:14
00103 Re: [xml-dev] RE: Namespace use cases Robert Koberg 2009-07-10 01:18
00045 Re: [xml-dev] RE: Namespace use cases Amelia A Lewis 2009-07-10 02:23
00039 Re: [xml-dev] RE: Namespace use cases Richard Salz 2009-07-10 02:56
00047 Re: [xml-dev] RE: Namespace use cases Kurt Cagle 2009-07-10 05:26
00034 Re: [xml-dev] RE: Namespace use cases James Fuller 2009-07-10 06:41
00051 Re: [xml-dev] RE: Namespace use cases Andrew Welch 2009-07-10 08:19
00032 RE: [xml-dev] RE: Namespace use cases Michael Kay 2009-07-10 08:23
00090 Re: [xml-dev] RE: Namespace use cases Dan Brickley 2009-07-10 08:25
00105 Re: [xml-dev] RE: Namespace use cases COUTHURES Alain 2009-07-10 08:27
00106 Re: [xml-dev] RE: Namespace use cases Andrew Welch 2009-07-10 09:20
00089 Re: [xml-dev] RE: Namespace use cases Rick Jelliffe 2009-07-10 10:27
00036 Re: [xml-dev] RE: Namespace use cases Michael Ludwig 2009-07-10 11:34
00048 Re: [xml-dev] RE: Namespace use cases Dimitre Novatchev 2009-07-10 13:14
00038 RE: [xml-dev] RE: Namespace use cases Michael Kay 2009-07-10 14:07
00044 Re: [xml-dev] RE: Namespace use cases Dimitre Novatchev 2009-07-10 16:15
00114 Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed? Michael Ludwig 2009-07-10 16:29
00121 RE: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed? Michael Kay 2009-07-10 17:04
00078 Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed? Peter Hunsberger 2009-07-10 17:45
00065 Re: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed? Michael Ludwig 2009-07-10 18:07
00068 RE: [xml-dev] XHTML 2 Working Group won't be renewed? Richard Salz 2009-07-11 01:42
00075 Re: [xml-dev] RE: Namespace use cases [email protected] 2009-07-11 10:06
00122 Re: [xml-dev] RE: Namespace use cases G. Ken Holman 2009-07-11 12:39
00112 Re: [xml-dev] RE: Namespace use cases [email protected] 2009-07-11 13:58
00127 Re: [xml-dev] RE: Namespace use cases Sean McGrath 2009-07-11 15:08
00109 Re: [xml-dev] RE: Namespace use cases Robert Koberg 2009-07-11 15:20
00067 Re: [xml-dev] RE: Namespace use cases Sean McGrath 2009-07-11 15:46
00076 Announce: Ant task for creating instances from XML (W3C) Schema Adam Flinton 2009-07-13 14:29
00123 Announce: Ant task for Diffing XML Files Adam Flinton 2009-07-13 14:31
00111 Re: [xml-dev] RE: Namespace use cases Micah Dubinko 2009-07-14 01:26
00115 Re: [xml-dev] RE: Namespace use cases Elliotte Harold 2009-07-14 13:52
00120 XML processor behavior with unused NS declarations Chuck Bearden 2009-07-14 16:38
00077 Re: [xml-dev] XML processor behavior with unused NS declarations G. Ken Holman 2009-07-14 16:58
00066 XHTML 5 - Time to simplify Jim Tivy 2009-07-14 16:59
00081 Re: [xml-dev] XML processor behavior with unused NS declarations Jeff Greif 2009-07-14 17:06
00063 Re: [xml-dev] RE: Namespace use cases [email protected] 2009-07-14 17:15
00107 Re: [xml-dev] XML processor behavior with unused NS declarations Richard Salz 2009-07-14 17:39
00088 Re: [xml-dev] RE: Namespace use cases Kurt Cagle 2009-07-14 17:52
00035 Re: [xml-dev] XML processor behavior with unused NS declarations C. M. Sperberg-McQueen 2009-07-14 17:53
00049 RE: [xml-dev] XML processor behavior with unused NS declarations Len Bullard 2009-07-14 18:12
00050 Re: [xml-dev] XML processor behavior with unused NS declarations C. M. Sperberg-McQueen 2009-07-14 18:56
00033 RE: [xml-dev] XML processor behavior with unused NS declarations Len Bullard 2009-07-14 19:33
00091 Re: [xml-dev] XML processor behavior with unused NS declarations Alessandro Vernet 2009-07-15 02:04
00104 ANN: Updated XProc Tutorial Costello, Roger L. 2009-07-18 17:50
00093 3rd International Rules Challenge - Call for Submissions Yuh-Jong Hu 2009-07-19 09:44
00101 Re: [xml-dev] RE: Namespace use cases Micah Dubinko 2009-07-20 01:54
00145 Early Bird Registration ends 31st July - 5th i-Semantics 2009/4th AIS SigPrag Int. Pragmatic Web Adrian Paschke 2009-07-22 18:37
00148 Re: [xml-dev] XML processor behavior with unused NS declarations Evan Lenz 2009-07-22 21:15
00135 Re: [xml-dev] RE: Namespace use cases Kurt Cagle 2009-07-23 05:22
00132 RE: [xml-dev] RE: Namespace use cases Michael Kay 2009-07-23 08:49
00133 DTD 2 Schema Paul M 2009-07-23 18:31
00134 Re: [xml-dev] DTD 2 Schema G. Ken Holman 2009-07-23 18:34
00149 Re: [xml-dev] DTD 2 Schema G. Ken Holman 2009-07-23 18:38
00144 RE: [xml-dev] XML processor behavior with unused NS declarations Jim Tivy 2009-07-23 21:19
00147 Re: [xml-dev] XML processor behavior with unused NS declarations Evan Lenz 2009-07-24 05:24
00146 RE: [xml-dev] XML processor behavior with unused NS declarations Michael Kay 2009-07-24 09:07
00141 Re: [xml-dev] XML processor behavior with unused NS declarations Chuck Bearden 2009-07-24 15:23
00138 Re: [xml-dev] XML processor behavior with unused NS declarations Evan Lenz 2009-07-24 16:28
00153 RE: [xml-dev] XML processor behavior with unused NS declarations Jim Tivy 2009-07-24 18:01
00154 ANN: XML Schema 1.1 Tutorial Costello, Roger L. 2009-07-24 19:30
00155 Re: [xml-dev] XML processor behavior with unused NS declarations Evan Lenz 2009-07-26 07:16
00152 Re: [xml-dev] ANN: XML Schema 1.1 Tutorial Ken Starks 2009-07-27 18:20
00139 Wikipedia on XML Tim Bray 2009-07-29 03:40
00140 RE: [xml-dev] Wikipedia on XML Michael Kay 2009-07-29 07:29
00137 Re: [xml-dev] Wikipedia on XML Ken Starks 2009-07-29 07:40
00142 XPointer string functions -- abandoned? Piotr Bański 2009-07-29 10:33
00136 RE: [xml-dev] XPointer string functions -- abandoned? Michael Kay 2009-07-29 10:44
00143 Re: [xml-dev] XPointer string functions -- abandoned? Rick Jelliffe 2009-07-29 10:45
00156 Re: [xml-dev] XPointer string functions -- abandoned? [email protected] 2009-07-29 11:05
00151 Re: [xml-dev] Wikipedia on XML Liam Quin 2009-07-29 15:01
00150 Pragmatic namespaces Micah Dubinko 2009-07-31 23:06