> I suggest we add a section on DTDs and validity rather than
> merging it in with other schema languages. For better or
> worse--probably worse, the XML specs do specially preference
> DTDs over other schema languages.
A better approach might be to treat DTDs in the structure of the article as
co-equal with other schema languages, and mention in the prose that for
historical reasons they are given a special status in the XML
recommendation. That's a better reflection of the reality of usage.
Regards,
Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/
http://twitter.com/michaelhkay
