2009/11/18 Rick Jelliffe <>:
> The second is that IMHO it is better to see RELAX NG as part of the ISO DSDL
> standard, so when there is some feature missing from RELAX NG, it may be
> provided elsewhere. This is a layered approach, where each language tries
> to do one thing really well, rather than a monolithic approach where . For
> example, you organize your system to that there is a master RELAX NG schema,
> then you add your restrictions as a layer in Schematron. You do the detailed
> cardnality constraints in Schematron.
Is this still the Schematron-that-is-a-generated-XSLT-transform, or is
there a Java based streaming validator available now?
--
Andrew Welch
http://andrewjwelch.com
Kernow: http://kernowforsaxon.sf.net/
