Julian Reschke wrote:
> Hi,
>
> "just" five years ago David Orchard and Richard Salz proposed a URN
> namespace to represent QNames (and expanded names). For some reason
> (lack of a use case?) that never was finished.
>
> In the meantime, I *do* have a use case, so I asked the original authors
> for permission to restart work.
>
> The new draft (01) essentially is identical to the draft from 2004,
> except for updated references and boilerplate, and an in-document issues
> list.
> ...
Minor correction: while looking at
<http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-rsalz-qname-urn-01.txt> I
realized that the document from which I started apparently already had a
few changes from the last published draft; apologies. (One change is an
extended prose explaining the URN scheme, the other one is a paragraph
about, um, XML 1.1, which I already identified as something we may want
to take out again).
Best regards, Julian
