Re: [xml-dev] Draft of W3C Note available for review: Associating Schemas with XML documents 1.0
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Edd Dumbill <[email protected]> wrote:
Ah I see. Yes, I misunderstood what you were saying.
Right. I do hope folks reconsider the question of a MIME type for RNG, though.
--
Uche Ogbuji http://uche.ogbuji.net
Founding Partner, Zepheira http://zepheira.com
Linked-in profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/ucheogbuji
Articles: http://uche.ogbuji.net/tech/publications/
TNB: http://www.thenervousbreakdown.com/author/uogbuji/
Friendfeed: http://friendfeed.com/uche
Twitter: http://twitter.com/uogbuji
http://www.google.com/profiles/uche.ogbuji
On Feb 16, 2010, at 12:03 PM, Uche Ogbuji wrote:This was my point. People don't really associate 'model' with defining what is valid in an XML document, they use the word 'schema', regardless of predilection or otherwise for XSD.
> Then again, "xml-schema" doesn't *have* to mean XSD. For example, xml-schema...type=application/xml+fakey-relaxng...
Ah I see. Yes, I misunderstood what you were saying.
> Oh wait! e.g. RELAX NG doesn't have a MIME type... Uh oh ;)Hehe. And further to my point, RELAX NG self-identifies as a "schema language for XML" per relaxng.org.
Right. I do hope folks reconsider the question of a MIME type for RNG, though.
--
Uche Ogbuji http://uche.ogbuji.net
Founding Partner, Zepheira http://zepheira.com
Linked-in profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/ucheogbuji
Articles: http://uche.ogbuji.net/tech/publications/
TNB: http://www.thenervousbreakdown.com/author/uogbuji/
Friendfeed: http://friendfeed.com/uche
Twitter: http://twitter.com/uogbuji
http://www.google.com/profiles/uche.ogbuji