Re: [xml-dev] Draft of W3C Note available for review: Associating Schemas with XML documents 1.0

Could this go any way, perhaps, to solving
the subset problem mentioned in previous
thread?
http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200908/threads.html#00318

Here I asked about ways to instruct processors
to regard an instance as one modeled as a subset
of a schema such that the instance should be valid
both by the schema and by some definition of the
subset (which could be Schematron or a list of
XPaths, say).

Best regards

Steve
---
Stephen D Green




2010/2/16 Jirka Kosek <>:
> Edd Dumbill wrote:
>>> and the desire for parallelism with the xml-stylesheet PI used
>>> to associate stylesheets with XML documents, ISO's SC 34/WG1 has
>>> requested to be able to use 'xml-model' for a PI target in an
>>> optional processing instruction that would allow the association
>>> of schemas with XML documents.
>>
>> I'll bite on this one. Why would one not use 'xml-schema'?
>
> xml-model is one character shorter so in sum it will save a lot of space
> and processing power. So it is perfectly aligned with the current "green
> computing" trend ;-)
>
> There were several proposals on the table including xml-schema, but if
> my recollection is right, counter argument against xml-schema was that
> it can lead to false conclusion that this PI is suitable only for use
> with W3C XML Schema and not with other schema languages like Schematron
> and RELAX NG.
>
>                        Jirka
>
> --
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>  Jirka Kosek      e-mail:       http://xmlguru.cz
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>       Professional XML consulting and training services
>  DocBook customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>  OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO JTC1/SC34 member
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>