-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Simon St.Laurent writes:
>> PR http://www.w3.org/TR/xlink11/
>
> Um, why?
>
> Is the shift from URI to IRI that important?
It is the _World Wide_ Web, so yes.
> Are there users of XLink demanding revision?
In one respect, yes: XLink 1.1 defines a simple profile, and allows
the use of xlink:href without an accompanying xlink:type. As a result
of this change such usage, which is already widespread in SVG and
DocBook, becomes conformant. AKA paving the footpaths.
ht
- --
Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 651-1426, e-mail:
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFLiOhXkjnJixAXWBoRAnslAJ0XELUgR2GPWOVxBcw7D+6KJFXl5wCfSqVJ
9DuxSRXVnkL52MmO7m3eh3I=
=vAKV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
