Re: [xml-dev] xlink 1.1
Dave Pawson wrote: > http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/PR-xlink11-20100225/Overview-diff10.html diff > to 1.0 > > PR http://www.w3.org/TR/xlink11/ Um, why? Is the shift from URI to IRI that important? Are there users of XLink demanding revision? I would have liked to see XLink succeed, but I think it's pretty clear that it didn't. Zombies do walk the earth lately, but I can't figure out what's re-animating this one. -- Simon St.Laurent http://simonstl.com/