At 2010-05-08 21:07 +0000, wrote:
>Like you say though, we need to cater for fine grained contexts.
>Maybe CAM is useful in this case.
>Also Schematron.
Well, now I think you are getting away from your initial premise,
which I understood to be divining meaning from interpreting
ontological relationships to schema constructs.
>They allow, I think, contexts beyond even parent
>/ child. The context could be any
>Xpath.
>A table with one column as an
>XPath and another as an RDFXML fragment which refers, say to a
>RDF or OWL ontology might do it.
Hmmmmmm ... interesting.
>Just inserting RDF into XSD might
>only suffice for when the context is simple.
>
>Context association files?
I think not ... OASIS Context/Value Association (CVA) files[1]
associate document contexts with value constraints, where the value
constraints are expressed either as XPath expressions or values from
genericode files. It isn't clear to me how they would help.
. . . . . . . . . . . Ken
[1] CVA files are now an OASIS Committee Specification ...
documentation and schemas are linked from the namespace RDDL document:
http://docs.oasis-open.org/codelist/ns/ContextValueAssociation/1.0/
--
XSLT/XQuery training: after http://XMLPrague.cz 2011-03-28/04-01
Vote for your XML training: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/x/i/
Crane Softwrights Ltd. http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/x/
G. Ken Holman mailto:
Male Cancer Awareness Nov'07 http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/x/bc
Legal business disclaimers: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal
