Rich Salz wrote:
> Of course it has a zillion (technical term :) false positives.
Rich, would you elaborate upon this please? Assume the DTD defines correctly the content of correct XML documents. You have an example of a correct XML document that fails DTD validation? That is, you have an example of a used namespace that is incorrectly identified as an unused namespace?
/Roger
-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Salz [mailto:]
Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 10:40 AM
To: Costello, Roger L.
Cc:
Subject: RE: [xml-dev] My report on experiments with unused namespaces
> Conclusion: it appears that one mechanism for detecting unused
> namespaces in an XML document is to validate it against a DTD. Can
> anyone think of a case where a DTD would not detect an unused namespace?
Of course it has a zillion (technical term :) false positives.
/r$
--
STSM, WebSphere Appliance Architect
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/soma/
