> It's x86 assembler, and to fit my memories of assembler it would have to
> be 6502, but it's certainly more useful this way on modern platforms:
>
> http://tibleiz.net/asm-xml/
>
> (via
> <http://radar.oreilly.com/2010/10/four-short-links-8-october-201.html>)
>
> I haven't tried it, but they definitely get points for bravery.
Don't forget Cameron's parser*, which uses C/C++ intrinsic functions
(which are just SIMD assembler instructions presented as C functions.) I'd
count that as assembler.
Cheers
Rick Jelliffe
*http://www.balisage.net/Proceedings/vol4/author-pkg/Cameron01/BalisageVol4-Cameron01.html
