David Carlisle <davidc <at> nag.co.uk> writes:
[...]
> Formally it's well formed but not namespace well formed (a term
> introduced by the namespaces rec). It may or may not be valid (depending
> on the dtd). If your parser is namespace aware it's likely to be
> rejected with a fatal error as it''s not namespace well formed.
>
> http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml-names/#dt-nwf
[...]
thanks for answering those questions, it's much easier to proceed :) Kinda
niggling questions, but helpful.
thanks,
Thufir
