Re: [xml-dev] RE: James Clark: XML versus the Web

> The number of times I've heard praise for AF on this list, yet
> no one has ever proposed an updated version for XML. Did it 
> have big holes? Was it SGML only? Any reason why it's not been
> reworked? 

There was nothing really that needed to be done to support architectural forms... you can use them today. It might have been nice to have a little syntactic sugar, but it was not necessary...