On 12/4/2010 10:39 PM, Ben Trafford wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-12-04 at 22:16 -0500, Kurt Cagle wrote:
>> For a comment syntax, what's wrong with
>> <xml:comment>....</xml:comment>?
>>
>> But that's ... that's ...
>>
>>
>> That's actually a very decent idea.
> I'll third that.
>
> --->Ben
metoo, but let's please allow for nesting this time. Extremely useful,
and not too hard to implement if you parse the contents of the comment
loosely (can't expect well-formedness, but can just search for
</xml:comment\s*>)
-Mike
