On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 06:14:02 -0800
Jamie Clark <> wrote:
> Personal opinions here - and no relation to my namesake in Thailand.
>
> Pete, what more is required? Isn't it already written up? As a true
> subset, it requires nothing from the XML standard itself
How about a parser/something to confirm that your instance *is* uxml?
Drifting into expanding the definition by aim or lack of thought could
be a problem if the recipient has process tools expecting uxml?
--
regards
--
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk
