On 16/12/2010 09:37, David Carlisle wrote:
> On 16/12/2010 08:15, rjelliffe wrote:
>> So is that IMDB behaviour being adopted by HTML5, too?
>
> yes
This is really scary. One guy makes a spelling mistake in his HTML and
the rest of us pay the price, just because his site is popular. This
can't be a sane way forward.
Back in about 1998, I was piggy-in-the-middle in a quarrel between a big
bank and Microsoft. Microsoft's first XML parser allowed </> as an end
tag, and the bank wrote a system that relied on this. Then W3C decided
not to allow this, Microsoft changed their parser accordingly, and the
bank was threatening to sue them for the costs incurred by a 2-month
delay to their systems going live, which they reckoned was about $1bn.
Fortunately for everyone, Microsoft didn't budge, and the bank were
persuaded that by using unratified standards they had been taking a risk
and had to accept the consequences.
Bending the standard because of a mistake made by one user, however
important they are, is surely increasing the lifetime cost to the
community rather than decreasing it. It feels like a bad decision.
Michael Kay
Saxonica
