μXML? μSchema? (was) Micro XSD for MicroXML?

Looking through the original compact syntax for RELAX NG.
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/relax-ng/compact-20021121.html
Hmm.  How close would that get you to a theoretical μXSD, if you
backed out namespaces?

~ James Bryce Clark
~ General Counsel, OASIS
~ http://www.oasis-open.org/who/staff.php#clark

On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 6:43 AM, Stephen Green
<> wrote:
> Now we have 'Micro XML', can't have a Micro XML Schema (Micro XSD)?
>
> What would it be?
>  no namespaces means no imports for a start ...
> What would be its role, since the schema might not necessarily
> be readable in all parsers capable of parsing Micro XML? Or would
> we want a version of XML Schema which could be so parsed?
> Or would we be more likely to recommend alternatives?
>
> Would it be classed as an early implementation of Micro XML?
> Would be now revisit the whole XML stack and recreate it or
> profile it for Micro XML?
> ----
> Stephen D Green
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
>
> XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS
> to support XML implementation and development. To minimize
> spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting.
>
> [Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/
> Or unsubscribe: 
> subscribe: 
> List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
> List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php
>
>