Re: [xml-dev] XMLisms and HTML parsing and modes (was: Re: XML5)

From
Henri Sivonen <>
To
" List" <>
Date
2010-12-16T23:38:49Z
ID
<>
Thread
Re: [xml-dev] XMLisms and HTML parsing and modes (was: Re: XML5)
On Dec 16, 2010, at 14:13, Liam R E Quin wrote:

> This <syntax /> came from SGML and was already legal in HTML from a
> formal standards perspective.

My understanding is that Annex K was added to SGML in late 1997 for the specific purpose of making XML 1.0 a subset of SGML. This was after HTML had been deployed.

Also, I believe no IETF or W3C HTML spec that pretends HTML to be an application of SGML actually enables the NET-enabled start tags.

Am I mistaken? 

-- 
Henri Sivonen

http://hsivonen.iki.fi/