Ignoring complexTypes and not attempting to be valid XSD, how about
just the following?
<element name="schema">
<element name="element">
<attribute name="name" type="string"/>
<attribute name="type" type="string">
<!-- enumerations = string integer decimal date -->
</attribute>
</element>
<element name="attribute">
<attribute name="name" type="string"/>
<attribute name="type" type="string">
<!-- enumerations = string integer decimal date -->
</attribute>
</element>
</element>
I think it is valid MicoXML, isn't it, and in the spirit of MicroXML
- easy to parse
- easy even to execute in MicroXML parsers if need be
Or adding a little more and it could be valid XSD too (but that
might be going too far in the direction of XSD).
----
Stephen D Green
On 17 December 2010 14:00, Dave Pawson <> wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 13:42:56 +0000
> Stephen Green <> wrote:
>
>> I notice the hint here that there may still be room for a MicroXSD
>> language.
>
>
> I most sincerely hope not Stephen.
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> regards
>
> --
> Dave Pawson
> XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
> http://www.dpawson.co.uk
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
>
> XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS
> to support XML implementation and development. To minimize
> spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting.
>
> [Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/
> Or unsubscribe:
> subscribe:
> List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
> List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php
>
>
