On Dec 17, 2010, at 9:13 AM, Stephen Green wrote:
> Ignoring complexTypes and not attempting to be valid XSD, how about
> just the following?
>
> <element name="schema">
> <element name="element">
> <attribute name="name" type="string"/>
> <attribute name="type" type="string">
> <!-- enumerations = string integer decimal date -->
> </attribute>
> </element>
> <element name="attribute">
> <attribute name="name" type="string"/>
> <attribute name="type" type="string">
> <!-- enumerations = string integer decimal date -->
> </attribute>
> </element>
> </element>
>
> I think it is valid MicoXML, isn't it, and in the spirit of MicroXML
> - easy to parse
> - easy even to execute in MicroXML parsers if need be
>
> Or adding a little more and it could be valid XSD too (but that
> might be going too far in the direction of XSD).
>
Looks a lot like Relax NG without namespaces.
