Re: [xml-dev] Never mind the browser, let's do MicroXML
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Rob Koberg <[email protected]> wrote:
RNG compact syntax is almost that. I do think it would be cool to support CSS-style selectors in RNG patterns, but probably not worth the compounded complexity.
--
Uche Ogbuji http://uche.ogbuji.net
Weblog: http://copia.ogbuji.net
Poetry ed @TNB: http://www.thenervousbreakdown.com/author/uogbuji/
Founding Partner, Zepheira http://zepheira.com
Linked-in: http://www.linkedin.com/in/ucheogbuji
Articles: http://uche.ogbuji.net/tech/publications/
Friendfeed: http://friendfeed.com/uche
Twitter: http://twitter.com/uogbuji
http://www.google.com/profiles/uche.ogbuji
(Wouldn't a CSS-like schema language be cool? In other words, for XML to gain adoption, don't always use XML.)
RNG compact syntax is almost that. I do think it would be cool to support CSS-style selectors in RNG patterns, but probably not worth the compounded complexity.
--
Uche Ogbuji http://uche.ogbuji.net
Weblog: http://copia.ogbuji.net
Poetry ed @TNB: http://www.thenervousbreakdown.com/author/uogbuji/
Founding Partner, Zepheira http://zepheira.com
Linked-in: http://www.linkedin.com/in/ucheogbuji
Articles: http://uche.ogbuji.net/tech/publications/
Friendfeed: http://friendfeed.com/uche
Twitter: http://twitter.com/uogbuji
http://www.google.com/profiles/uche.ogbuji