Re: [xml-dev] Status of MicroXML?
On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 12:50 AM, Dave Pawson <[email protected]> wrote:
To be fair, that's a different thread. As I read that thread, it's more about figuring out what approach to schema for MicroXML will offer a worthy level of simplicity. Yes some are calling for something new, but just as many are saying "Just use RNG, Schematron, Examplotron, etc."
--
Uche Ogbuji http://uche.ogbuji.net
Weblog: http://copia.ogbuji.net
Poetry ed @TNB: http://www.thenervousbreakdown.com/author/uogbuji/
Founding Partner, Zepheira http://zepheira.com
Linked-in: http://www.linkedin.com/in/ucheogbuji
Articles: http://uche.ogbuji.net/tech/publications/
Friendfeed: http://friendfeed.com/uche
Twitter: http://twitter.com/uogbuji
http://www.google.com/profiles/uche.ogbuji
Am I wrong in this, or has this thread changed to 'lets invent
a new schema language'
To be fair, that's a different thread. As I read that thread, it's more about figuring out what approach to schema for MicroXML will offer a worthy level of simplicity. Yes some are calling for something new, but just as many are saying "Just use RNG, Schematron, Examplotron, etc."
--
Uche Ogbuji http://uche.ogbuji.net
Weblog: http://copia.ogbuji.net
Poetry ed @TNB: http://www.thenervousbreakdown.com/author/uogbuji/
Founding Partner, Zepheira http://zepheira.com
Linked-in: http://www.linkedin.com/in/ucheogbuji
Articles: http://uche.ogbuji.net/tech/publications/
Friendfeed: http://friendfeed.com/uche
Twitter: http://twitter.com/uogbuji
http://www.google.com/profiles/uche.ogbuji