Re: [xml-dev] Towards XML 2.0

From
Dave Pawson <>
To
Elliotte Rusty Harold <>
Date
2010-12-04T14:21:08Z
ID
<20101204142108.5f97dfca@marge3>
Thread
Re: [xml-dev] Towards XML 2.0
On Sat, 4 Dec 2010 09:09:49 -0500
Elliotte Rusty Harold <> wrote:

> > I think the XML 2.0 spec should have a 'Compatibility' section in
> > it that says if you want your XML 2.0 document to be valid XML 1.0,
> > then take note of the following ... .  One of the things it would
> > mention is comments.
> 
> That's certainly worth considering. Perhaps there should be two
> levels? a basic level with no XML declaration that is XML 1.0


Easy test, how easy would that be to explain to a newbie?
Surely if you want XML 1.0, use it. The new work should remain new
and kept that way?

Certainly worth an explanatory section saying what is/isn't backwards
compatible.



-- 

regards 

-- 
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk