XMLj is the obvious choice for a name.
Seriously though, I think this is good to be published. I shyed away from
JSONx because it was copyrighted to IBM and I didn't want to deal with an
army of lawyers. I dont personally like how JSON objects and members are
combined into one XML object, its not a "clean" mapping of XML to JSON,
IMHO,
plus it doesn't handle non XML character data well (say NUL's) ... but
overall I think its a good thing to have a standard then none in this area.
----------------------------------------
David A. Lee
http://www.xmlsh.org
-----Original Message-----
From: John Cowan [mailto:] On Behalf Of John Cowan
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2011 12:06 PM
To: Richard Salz
Cc:
Subject: Re: [xml-dev] JSONx sent to the IETF
Richard Salz scripsit:
> We've published JSONx, the XML/JSON mapping some IBM products use, as
> an IETF draft.
Cool. What is not cool, however, is the name. It is boring,
unmnemonic, ... in short, IBM. Can it be changed?
--
Winter: MIT, John Cowan
Keio, INRIA,
Issue lots of Drafts. http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
So much more to understand!
Might simplicity return? (A "tanka", or extended
haiku)
_______________________________________________________________________
XML-DEV is a publicly archived, unmoderated list hosted by OASIS
to support XML implementation and development. To minimize
spam in the archives, you must subscribe before posting.
[Un]Subscribe/change address: http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/
Or unsubscribe:
subscribe:
List archive: http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php
