Original Message From: "David Lee"
> Re Pete's
> =====
> ". But I believe that there are new XML uses created everyday
> that are essentially islands. These XML uses could quite easily adopt an
> alternative non-backwards compatible method of namespaces with very little
> pain, and quite a lot of gain."
> =====
>
> I suggest that if its islands you're interested in (as I often am) then
> the
> simpler solution is simply not to use namespaces. Out of 10 years
> working
> with XML there are only a few times i've *HAD* to use namespaces, and
> those
> are integrating with or using other vocabularies that already required
> namespaces.
>
> In all my "island" work I dont bother with namespaces at all.
That's a good point David. But I do believe that a number of XML
applications communicate via the sea (!!!!) of the Internet and for that
reason I like to include some namespace information in the XML instances.
Pete Cordell
Codalogic Ltd
Interface XML to C++ the easy way using C++ XML
data binding to convert XSD schemas to C++ classes.
Visit http://codalogic.com/lmx/ or http://www.xml2cpp.com
for more info
Twitter: http://twitter.com/petecordell
